... Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Carbon...whats with all the random car pictures?? Harleys, old British cars, jags? Great pics nonetheless!
Thanks, David... i really love my camera; so i try to use it whenever a chance arises... i also haven't driven my car in a while as i'm waiting to get it fixed, so i'm lusting for just about anything with wheels...
Thanks, guys... i'm not much for Jaguars, either, but it was there - i'll take pictures of just about anything... Sunny, et al, just post your email address and which pictures you want hi-res copies of... Uro, it's a FujiFilm FinePix 4900Z with 6x Zoom...
Whether it is a product of brand/platform engineering or not, it is still a nice car. On the upside you could probably get it serviced at any Ford dealer in a pinch, and there are certainly more development hours spent on the platform than if it was a stand-alone chassis like Ferrari.
somebody told me that Aston Martin Vanquish engine was nothing but the union of a couple of Mondeo engines; V6 times 2 = V 12 is that true?
The Vanquish engine had a little bit more development to it than that, hehe. I'll PM you my addy, Carb! Send those leaper shots please! The Contour chassis was used as the baseline for the X-Type. Also, the X-Type borrows heavily from the parts bins from Ford for switches and electronics. The V6 was also taken from Ford and modified by Jaguar similiar to how the 3.2L was taken from Jaguar by Aston and modified for the DB7. The X-Type can be a fun car with the 3.0L Sport w/h AWD but the J-Gate is very notchy with a short throw and takes a bit getting used to in order to get the most from the AWD (corner carving). The build quality on it is average and the primary reason why Jaguar tanked in the reliability ratings aside from some S-Type transmission issues that cropped up on the earlier models. Some S-Types and X-Types have lots of "unresolved" issues that are dubbed "characteristics" meaning they won't be fixed by the factory which makes it a complete waste of cash buying new. Which would you rather have for $35k, a new X-Type with 6 years warranty given the above statements or a Select Edition XJR/S-Type R with 2.5-3 years of warranty? I know which one I would take. People who jump over to Jags from 3-series, A4's, S60's, C/E class MBs, get a taste of the "bad Jaguars" with the X-Type and why they are cancelling the model in 2006/7 (thankfully). Sunny
Is it just me, or is Jaguar losing its distinguished, rarefied, sleek image? Their new cars make a stodgy, stubby first impression (not talking about the convertible, but the sedan)...not very evocative of the cat they are named after. NNO, nice shots, except the last one looks like a squirrel, not a graceful big cat.