What I think we need, is another number. What you guys think? What we had was Eight * * * One * * * Eight * * * Seven * * * Seven * * * ??? Who can guess the next number?
I have 3 questions before we move on: 1: How big is the pastrami sandwich ? 2: How many does the winner get ? 3: Does the winner also get french fries ?
Interesting, if you use Yahoo search and type “ secondary phase collections “ This comes up no.1 http://www.bumchecks.net/Phase2.htm
Correct, "3" questions. 1: How big is the pastrami sandwich ? > THREE FEET 2: How many does the winner get ? > THREE 3: Does the winner also get french fries? > YES, THREE
It would be so much easier to jus pay the debt. But I guess that's not in the program. That's just fine and dandy, I can play this game, I am actually pretty good at it, and I even get paid to do it. Stay tuned....this will become fun. I will be back with facts.
Several cases currently ongoing. These cases need to be made public sooner rather than later. This will prevent this from happening to other suppliers and individuals.
California Law California Civil Code section 1719 allows the receiver of a bad check to recover three times the amount of the check in civil courts. The damages are in addition to collecting the value of the check and they could include court and mailing costs. A cause of action under this law may be brought in small claims court, if the claim does not exceed $5,000, or in any other court of jurisdiction depending on the amount of the transaction. Rules specifically prohibit the writing, drawing, drafting, and/or submission of any dishonorable, illegitimate, bogus, fake, or unendorsable financial instrument . >>>>>>> Not withstanding any applicable legal remedies, the names and addresses of all bad check writers and the parties whom were the intended beneficiaries of the bad check funds may be published in a public forum for the purpose of soliciting the whereabouts of such persons. >>>>>>> Posting the check writer's last known address and/or name of Employer on the Internet may be an effective means of locating the check writer for further attempts to resolve the outstanding balance, or clarify any remaining disputes. Intentionally or negligently writing a bad check constitutes a complete and total waiver of all confidentiality rights on the part of the affected party; such conduct is an explicit violation of and overt disrespect for the ethics and morality clause.
Maybe then, we need to change the bet to: > upper bunk or > lower bunk The one who guess correctly gets a pastrami sangwich.
It deserves its own thread with facts to justify. This is the only way it should be done. Enough is enough. The floor is yours, senator.
Hey Ford _ _ _ _ _ _ Lets get philosophical. John 4:37 : For this saying is true : one sows, and another reaps : : You have reaped, for which you have not labored; others have labored, and you have entered into their labors, and taken from them, that which is not yours :
Make No Con _ _ _ _ _ _ , This is no illusion, Like when you take a massive dump, Often times remains, a mini protrusion. In time, subsides the protrusion, It was no delusion, But nonetheless you perform some checks , To avoid further Con _ _ _ _ _ _ ( hold on hold on . I got another one ) Under the hood of a car is a _ _ _ _ _ , When you hit the brakes it grabs the rotor, With the brakes, you can make many stops, Just like the visits you had from the cops. I kicked a ball in the air, It went so high I did not care, It came down on my head unannounced, Just like the checks you wrote _ _ _ _ _ _ _