Airline pilots see 'a guy in a jetpack' flying 3,000 feet over LA | FerrariChat

Airline pilots see 'a guy in a jetpack' flying 3,000 feet over LA

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by ylshih, Sep 1, 2020.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. ylshih

    ylshih Shogun Assassin
    Honorary Owner

    Mar 21, 2004
    19,828
    Northern CA
    Full Name:
    Yin
  2. Natkingcolebasket69

    Natkingcolebasket69 F1 World Champ

    Wow that’s crazy!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  3. Hannibal308

    Hannibal308 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 3, 2012
    6,314
    Kahuku / Cottonwood / Prescott
    Full Name:
    Will
    Party ballon shaped like Ironman.
     
  4. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,244
    That would be a lot more likely for sure. I wonder if there's any chance the plane's tail had a camera for passengers to have a view and it shows it.
     
    Jacob Potts likes this.
  5. Hannibal308

    Hannibal308 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 3, 2012
    6,314
    Kahuku / Cottonwood / Prescott
    Full Name:
    Will
    Regardless...maybe it was an alien...a Mandalor...the new pentagon UFO team should get right on it!
     
  6. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,103
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    jcurry likes this.
  7. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    21,581
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Of course that could mean you can fly the thing at 15k, but not necessarily take off from SL and climb to 15k and return (10min endurance). Need to wear a chest mounted chute.
     
  8. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,103
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    I would agree with that, but you could certainly go to 3000 feet.
     
    jcurry likes this.
  9. ylshih

    ylshih Shogun Assassin
    Honorary Owner

    Mar 21, 2004
    19,828
    Northern CA
    Full Name:
    Yin
    I noted that 3000' was feasible in the original post, but a 1000 fpm climb rate and a similar controlled descent rate, would take 6 minutes, which seems iffy with a 5-10 minute fuel tank capacity. This was reported by pilots coming into LAX, so I'm assuming the starting altitude was near sea level and that climb power and descent power fuel flow averages out somewhat.
     
  10. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    7,917
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    I worked with three engineers that were hang glider pilots operating out of the bluffs near Lake Chelan, Wa. One of them , using thermals from the numerous cumulus in eastern Wa., got to 10,000ft and almost to Spokane. Many times these guys would cruise to Ritzville and all over eastern Wa. and some times return to their starting point. Sailplane pilots operating out of Mazama strip would be gone from just after 0900 to 1700 or later and would visit Canada and Idaho. I flew with one of them locally and I couldn't believe how easy it is to find lift over the mountains there on a warm day...like a high speed elevator. . All you have to do is to sit there and you go up. A real kick in the butt and real flying. I remember one older guy who was gone all day had to spin his airplane over the strip to lose altitude as fast as he wanted. Absolutely the best stuff.
     
    Jacob Potts and tritone like this.
  11. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,103
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    I would think rates of climb (and certainly descent) would be significantly higher than that, but maybe not. 1000 fpm is only 20mph vertically, and this thing should be able to exceed that. Practically speaking, much over 3000fpm would be uncomfortable, though.

    2000fpm would cut the time in half, and they claim a 10 minute endurance.
     
  12. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    21,581
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Very dependent on the wt of the operator/pilot. The JB-10 has a max thrust (ISA) of 395lb, and weighs 83 lb empty. Assume the fuel load is only 12 lb, then the initial net thrust to lift the pilot is 300 lb. A 200 lb pilot will see a thrust of 100 lb, while a 150 lb pilot would see a net thrust of 150 lb or 50% greater than the heavier pilot. Bit difference in acceleration, obtainable vertical speed, and as the link also states "Endurance is dependent on pilot weight and density altitude".
     
  13. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    21,581
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    I've been in mt waves along the east side of the Sierra's (in a Mooney). Glider pilots love those things. But better have some O2 on board as it is an elevator that can be impossible to get out quickly, or without exceeding airframe limits.

    I don't think a jet pack is a very good glider. YMMV ;)
     
    Jacob Potts likes this.
  14. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    7,917
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    I remember reading about a researcher guy who soared to 30,000 ft in a P-38 with the power off when he was investigating that standing wave. The glider pilots that I mentioned had O2 and plenty of energy bars on board when they departed.
     
    Jacob Potts likes this.
  15. ylshih

    ylshih Shogun Assassin
    Honorary Owner

    Mar 21, 2004
    19,828
    Northern CA
    Full Name:
    Yin
    The 1000fpm estimate came from the linked article about the JB-10.

    The excess thrust calculation above might be a bit off. The JB-9 was reported to have a fuel capacity of 38 liters or 10 gallons. The JB-10 was said to be similar to the JB-9, but with more fuel capacity, but I couldn't find what the increase was. Let's say it's 15 gallons, so as to make the increase over the JB-9 worthwhile. The fully fueled weight of the jet pack is then 83 lbs + 102 lbs (15 gals x 6.8 lbs/gal) = 185 lbs. With thrust of 395 lbs and a 200 lb standard FAA male and 185 lbs of equipment+fuel, that only leaves 10lbs excess thrust! It would be very sensitive to the weight of the pilot.

    That may be why they went to the JB-11, which has an empty weight of 115 lbs but was increased to 530 lbs of thrust.

    P.S. I did find that the rumored price of the JB-10 was $250,000 (apparently recently discontinued in favor of the JB-11), the full flight school is $30,000 and an introductory flight is $3,000.

    P.P.S. JetPack Aviation is located in LA, where the sightings occurred.
     
    jcurry likes this.
  16. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    21,581
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    I believe that wt is slightly conservative as it includes an allowance for carry-on bags.
    https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC120-27E.pdf

    Interesting that the AC defines acceptable methods for air carriers to use in wt and balance calcs, yet the actual floor loading limits used for design of the aircraft are based on an avg pax wt of 170 lb (plus carry-on wt and seat wt).
     
  17. ylshih

    ylshih Shogun Assassin
    Honorary Owner

    Mar 21, 2004
    19,828
    Northern CA
    Full Name:
    Yin
    OK, good clarification. So the FAA summer weight of a male is 200 lbs and assumes 5 lbs is summer clothing and 16 lbs for personal effects. But trade that off with a flight suit (over light clothing) plus a helmet and net it might be 10 lbs lighter to a wash. So maybe 10-20 lbs of excess thrust?
     
  18. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    21,581
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Looking at prior revisions to AC120-27 the FAA Standard male has added 30lb in the last 30 yrs. Women even more. America needs to go on a diet.
     
  19. MarkPDX

    MarkPDX F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Apr 21, 2003
    15,111
    Gulf Coast
    Hannibal308 likes this.
  20. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,244
    This thing can get up to 10,000 feet. It's got a pretty slick turn.

     
  21. tritone

    tritone F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 8, 2003
    6,883
    On the Rock
    Full Name:
    James
    Beyond all the technology, I assume this thing must still be subject to FAA regs like everyone else, so was he legal or bootleg?

    (mandalorians excepted of course.....)
     
  22. boxerman

    boxerman F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    May 27, 2004
    18,838
    FL
    Full Name:
    Sean
    Im speculating that the FAA is speakign with Jet Pack aviation to see has a jet pack and who maybe was flying that day.
    Could also be some backyard unit, lots of microturbines about.
     
  23. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    21,581
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    They are cool little units, but
    @ 10 min endurance damn are they thirsty.

    I know, I know, they are turbojets, which have always been thirsty.

    Should probably just use the search function, but didn't someone make strap on wings with a couple/four of these units attached?
     
  24. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,103
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    According to their website, depending on which model it is, it's either experimental or an ultralight. I'm not all that familiar with ultralight regulations, but I assume the same airspace stuff applies to them as it does to everyone else. I'm sure that would be the case if they are running it in experimental.
     
  25. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,103
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don

Share This Page