When did "they" start putting computer chips in cars? | FerrariChat

When did "they" start putting computer chips in cars?

Discussion in 'General Automotive Discussion' started by Texas Forever, Mar 30, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Texas Forever

    Texas Forever Eight Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 28, 2003
    85,535
    Texas!
    I'm probably going to get banned for this. But, hey, what's a life without risk.

    I also posted this in technical.

    What year would you say that they started putting chips in cars? 1983?

    I just found out today that my C55 doesn't have a dipstick. That's it. I quit. I'm going to flip a digit to the digital age.

    Dale
     
  2. Horsefly

    Horsefly F1 Veteran

    May 14, 2002
    6,929
    The Corvette amd many other GM cars started using computer controlled carburetors in 1981. In 1982 they switched to a throttle body system in the Corvette and eliminated the carburetor completely. Of course it probably depends upon which manufacturer you are asking about, but 1981 is the general year for GM to start using computers. The 1981 vintage computer controlled carburetor was an interim system between old fashioned carburetors and throttle body injector systems.
     
  3. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    23,687
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    I will pass up on the obvious dipstick joke.

    :D
     
  4. TexasF355F1

    TexasF355F1 Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 2, 2004
    71,884
    Cloud-9
    Full Name:
    Jason
    This actually brings up another issue. The electronic oil meter.

    I hate the fact that I don't have a dipstick in my car. I have to go by this stupid computer readout. The dipstick is on thing that should be left alone.
     
  5. Smiles

    Smiles F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 20, 2003
    16,673
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Full Name:
    Matt F
    I think that that exact sentiment explains why mechanical watches are enjoying extreme popularity.

    Surprisingly, there's a similar revival in using straight razors for shaving. (And I'm completely serious!)
     
  6. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    You know, there might be legitimate reasons besides just checking the level to actually look at your oil once in a while...I suppose this means there is not one on new automatic transmissions, either?

    BTW, there is kind of a "grey area" here on "what exactly is a computer". Early EFI came along in the seventies, IIRC, and you might make the point that it was sort of an "analog computer".

    For sure I had a 1983/1984 early C4 Corvette that had a heck of a computerized instrument panel. It spawned quite the little cottage industry for retired TV repairman types who would fix them for less than the approximately $1600.00 that GM wanted for their little darling. To be fair, I guess the Z51 suspension put a lot of stress on it - it would even knock out the taillights every two or three months.
     
  7. TexasF355F1

    TexasF355F1 Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 2, 2004
    71,884
    Cloud-9
    Full Name:
    Jason
    Exactly.
     
  8. mattymouse33

    mattymouse33 F1 Rookie

    Oct 25, 2004
    4,632
    We'll set aboot ye!
    Full Name:
    Matthew
    Personally I would rather have the dgital readout, that way its much less responsibility on my part.
     
  9. tritone

    tritone F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 8, 2003
    7,178
    On the Rock
    Full Name:
    James
    I know what you mean!

    That's why I like an automatic transmission too; way less responsibility to have to coordinate the clutch and gas and shifter....

    (my god, a clutch! what were they thinking?)
     
  10. TexasF355F1

    TexasF355F1 Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 2, 2004
    71,884
    Cloud-9
    Full Name:
    Jason
    LOL.
     
  11. Pantera

    Pantera F1 Rookie

    Nov 6, 2004
    4,479
    Sometime after the F-117 was built. :D
     
  12. senna21

    senna21 F1 Rookie

    Jul 2, 2004
    3,334
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Charles W
    My buddy's 99 Jag XJR doesn't have one on his transmission. It's actually a MB unit Jag used. He's been having transmission issues and asked my advice. First thing out of my mouth was to check the fluid level. He has no way to do so. :confused:

    And for those Jag lovers, yes his engine has already failed due to the Nikasil cylinder liners. Luckily he had an extended warrantee. Best $3K he'd ever spent. :)
     

Share This Page