Hey Greg, You forgot to mention one of the cooler features - - 3 position adjustable ride control. For all that the T gives us in advancements, I'll gladly pay the $1500 dollars difference in the cost for a straight "like for like" major service. Cheers, Hank
Normally you would be best to drive both. Keep in mind these are now old cars even the newest T model is over 20 yrs. Test driving both thinking each should be equally reflective of what's out there might be misleading. Never drove a T, guess it might be better handling by the numbers. I did drive a 355 which has power steering and it felt numb after getting out of my 3.2 Buying a Ferrari of this era like any old car is more about the experience than all out performance. You either get it or you don't. Read about 328 vs. early 348's for an idea as well about reliability. In the end which ever one moves you the most is the right car.
I have owned both a 3.2 and a T and both were coupes. The T with adjustable shocks, power steering, lower center of gravity, more power, and a cleaner interior design is my favorite. Engine out service for the T is more costly but is only done every 3 to 5 years depending on who you believe and maybe on how hard you drive it. The looks of both cars are beautiful and I drove both regularly and on long trips. Be sure to get a car with service records. Good luck you will enjoy whatever you buy - nothing like a Ferrari from the 80s Bob
When I was looking, I narrowed my choices down to a late (88+) 3.2 or a t. For me the decision was easy, I found the t a much better car FOR ME in almost every respect. I weighed the extra cost of service every 5 years, but other than that and better cheese graters on the 3.2, i found the t better in every way. It was the right choice for me. But recognize, every one has different likes and needs. I think if a prospective driver can drive good examples of each, then that buyer makes a knowledgeable choice, whichever they prefer. What is right for one is not necessarily right for another. So, vive le difference!!! Regards, Jerry
Agree. I started with a 3.2 then drove a t. For me it was the better choice but both cars fit into a similar window.
Now you're opening a can of worms bringing up the much discussed timing belt change interval! You will find many many different opinions on the subject for sure. Cheers, Greg Originally Posted by ScottCDallas View Post Have you ever seen over 100k on a Mondial with out an engine rebuild?
This is absurd, and certainly not a legitimate reason to avoid the t. A shop's incompetence and procrastination is not a reason to condemn a car. After owning a large independent Ferrari shop for over two decades, I became familiar with the latter...