I am still having the car worked on so this is a little early, but I am curious to hear what people think abou tmy PPI experience with my CS. I won't name any names yet, but I had a PPI done at a Ferrari dealership on my CS before I bought it. During that PPI they revealed that the car had failing pre cats and about 4-5 other super small items (Loose seat, piece of plastic under the gas pedal cracked.) It was literally a handwritten list of 5 or so items on a regular piece of paper. That was the extent of my PPI. I had to ask them to them after to check and give me clutch wear (It's at 60%), brake wear (they are close to 100%. He believes they were replaced at some point since they are basically new), and pay $250 more for an electronic engine compression test which is passed with flying colors. I also asked for the previous service records and all was good and I bought the car. Getting the car to a friends shop to have him install the headers. At the shop and once on the lift, the car is extremely clean and the underside of the car look practically new. Very happy to see that after 18,000 miles and 19 years of use. While there I decided to have a little more work done and it involved a dyno run. After doing the dyno run, it was noticed that the car was running way way under power. 298HP at the wheels. Looking into what was wrong, the vacuum system was leaking so the muffler valves and the valves in the intake manifold were not working at all. Also, the car had some wonky ECU tune done to it and codes covered up. All of that was fixed, ECU tune returned to stock, and the car was redynoed and it's creating good power now. 355HP at the wheels. There was also a hole on the underside of the exhaust that was patched and welded shut. Easy fix. Lastly, the one thing not getting fixed right now, is that the timing was also shown to be at 654 and 656. Not the end of the world, and it still runs great. It could have honestly came from Ferrari originally like that, but it could be running even better since it's not the 660 and 660 that it should be, also considering that a Ferrari mechanic did the last major service on the car 2 years ago. I assumed they would have made sure it was perfect? I guess not though. I will be fixing this myself in my garage when I change the timing belt again this year, and then the car will be even better! To make things even better, my friend is going to be driving the car for a few days so the ECU can learn and smooth things out, and then we are doing the 360trev tune on the car then a final dyno run and it's finally headed to me working properly! the shop and 360trev have been absolutely amazing to work with, but that is for another a much longer post I will make once I have the car in my possession. This post is about the dealership and my expectations being correct or not. I called the dealership today to fill him in and see if they wanted to make anything right. Told them about the ECU tune, the holes in the exhaust, the fact the muffler and intake manifold valves were nor working, the timing being slightly off, and the few other issues found. The short answer was that it is what it is, they are human, and that's that. They also slightly implied that the shop it's at (A car friend of mine for 20 years who's shop works on extremely high dollar and high horsepower cars) might have been messing things up without telling me to make more money. Not their exact words but he was implying that. Definitely insulting hear. My question for everyone is if this is normal or even acceptable for a Ferrari dealership? Should I demand a refund on my money for the inspection at the least or were my expectations for a $1,500 inspection plus $250 engine compression test too high, and I am the one being unreasonable? Are my expectations for the timing to be spot on for a car that was sold as being a top tier track speced street car 20 years ago reasonable, or am I just being silly and it's normal to need to fix it yourself? The car is still wonderful, and in excellent condition outside, inside, and underside. I would have still bought it even knowing these few issues, but I would have perhaps asked for a slightly lower price like I asked for and got because of the failing pre cats. That's the whole reason I got the PPI done for $1,500 and paid an additional $250 for the engine compression test. Interested to hear what other much more experienced Ferrari owners think. Thank you, Mike
I would ask for refund personally. How would they not catch the vacuum valves not working. Its also why I lot of shops dont do PPIs so it cuts both ways
Congrats on a sweet CS, post pics! I don’t easily trust people I don’t know. That’s why I skipped ppi on my last 4 fun car purchases. If the price was good enough, had good maintenance records, and drove solid on a nice long test drive, I would mentally be prepared for any unexpected costs down the road. It’s always hard to the get the money back after the fact. if they dont refund u, don’t sweat it. $1750 goes by in a flash when taking into account maintenance costs for an f car in the long run!
I dont think your being unreasonable However i dont like your chances of them refunding you All i suggest is future get someone trusted for ppi and also verify yourself If that means putting in on a hoist and looking like a pedantic idiot then so be it Enjoy
I had a body shop do a PPI and miss that a whole panel was horribly painted once I was not a happy camper - “I paid you to literally do just one thing” water under bridge - def post pics!
My PPI was a terrible experience as well, it was completed by a very reputable company. Several missed items including a fuel pump that was spewing fuel onto the manifolds. Exhaust checked “perfect”, but found the normal cracked manifolds, one non functional valve, ect…… the list of things they missed was very long and the car had 10k of repairs. All things that are typically Ferrari but I asked them to check. The owner called me back after an email and worked with me to make it right and sent me parts that were difficult for me to find equivalent to the money spent (he offer a refund or to help locate parts). I would definitely speak to them! Congrats on the car!! Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat.com mobile app
No you are absolutely not being unreasonable. Common problem these days across the board: Lack of caring by representatives and workers getting paid big bucks Lack of training by the company (in this case the Dealership) to insure a standard is met Lack of interest in doing work that is deemed as "doesn't pay enough" -- but take the job anyway I've lived a long time and done a lot of things from restoring a home to restoring cars and designing my own products to market and sell. The aforementioned issues are rampant these days but certainly not a new problem in the business worlds I circulate in. Funny that recently I contemplated moving to a new state. But the idea that I would have to leave behind all my trusted sources for all the things I enjoy doing was, the more I thought about it, a deal breaker. Yes you could ask for your money back. But as some here have mentioned, good luck. I don't see that happening and the Dealership knows there's little you can effectively do to get a refund. On the bright side... Congrats on your new CS. Thankfully it is most everything you expected and you still have a great feeling about your purchase. And of course, tell anyone who will listen about your poor experience with the Dealer.
I think PPI's are overrated, hear me out. If they charge you $250 for a PPI, that's basically an hour's work or so. They're not going to take the floor off to inspect under the car and catch the exhaust hole. they're only going to check codes, they're not going to check hose connections for vacuums leaks. The vision in a buyers mind is that a PPI is an intensive review that should catch most things and the reality is that the cost and time invested in how it's done today won't catch all but the most obvious. My bet is that you're really just paying for a mechanics eyes and a tool isn't really ever picked up (yes an exaggeration). I think the PPI buyers want would probably cost something closer to $2k - maybe the dealers will recognize this and offer a few levels of PPI, the highest level with some kind of guarantee?
Not unreasonable. Probably unlikely they'll refund you though considering they're already downplaying your friend's shop honesty. I had a not so great PPI as well from a shop that everyone raved about. Paid $650 and then overpaid for some repairs that were needing to be done and ended up with a chip on my bumper that they denied making. No check list, no pictures, just a verbal over the phone and "PPI" written on my receipt. The inspection on my daily beater was more complete and in depth. Took it as a learning experience and won't go back there again. I'm a firm believer in the adage of "if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself." I realize not everyone is mechanically inclined, but if you were, then you really see how bad some "great" shops operate. Couple that with these cars getting older, younger buyers moving in that didn't pay as much, and you can get a mix of snobbyness or lack of interest thrown in as well if you go the dealer route. Not unique to this brand either, that goes for just about any make unfortunately and gets worse as you move down market. I have a few older jeeps that I treat as well as my F430 when it comes to maintenance but shops just treat them like "old jeeps" and throw wrenches around marring things up or not cleaning as they go. As KC360 mentioned, one of my biggest regrets in moving states was losing a trusted mechanic that was as much of an enthusiast and perfectionist as me. You don't find those easily and so far I've been disappointed in every mechanic I've tried that was recommended as being the place to go.
You could ask for some money back but.. good luck with that. I think that there are alot of misconceptions about what constitutes a PPI and what a Ferrari dealership is. First of all the Ferrari dealership is just. another. repair shop. That's it. Their "trained technicians" have not likely trained to work on 20 year old cars. I wouldn't be surprised if the techs don't have any official training and worked at a Honda shop before working at Ferrari and there is only one laster tech supervising. They're a new car dealership that services faults in the new cars under warranty. You want someone who knows your model. Now what constitutes a PPI. And this might ruffle some feathers but I don't care. 1. How much do you think you can actually do when inspecting a car that you don't own? When the inspection is done... you don't own the car. Would you let some mechanic take a wrench and physically disassemble YOUR car for someone who might not physically buy it? No. 2. There will be issues that aren't picked up in a PPI. You CANNOT pick up everything on an exam. The vacuum leaks? Part of the course. Should have thrown a code but presumably didn't 3. When i had mine inspected there were things that weren't picked up. As there will be. It's a used car. 4. To find everything wrong with the car, you have to disassemble things to do it. This will not get done and you're not going to have permission to do this by the prior owner. 5. The reason why PPI's are do expensive.. is because the new owner expects EVERYTHING to be picked up in the inspection which is simply not possible. So shops jack up the price or just stop even offering to do them. I wouldn't do them. The buyers expectation is ridiculous IMHO. 6. Again.. you cannot look at EVERYTHING on the car during a PPI and even with an inspection scope you're going to miss something.
I understand all of this, however how do they miss holes in the exhaust pipes? Or not notice that the valves are wide open the entire time? I was also toldif they would have just plugged into the car, they would have noticed that the ECU had been changed and codes hidden. That seems like the basic of basic for $1,500, but maybe my expectations are too high. By what their report said was wrong, it appears all they did was walk around the car, peek in it, and then look back at an earlier record from a few months before that the headers were failing. Just seems wrong to me. I appreciate everyone's feedback a lot. I won't be asking for money back and it's just a lesson learned. Thank you. Just more reason for me to just continue working on my own CS as I always have worked on all my other cars.
In hindsight, everything is visible. The key is the PPI did do what it was intended. You got a great car that can be made perfect. There were no really big things that were missed, and I hope you can now enjoy the stallion in the garage! You've earned it.
Your expectations aren't too high, they are simply misplaced. While I'm certainly not a certified Ferrari tech, I do know this platform decently enough. If I were to inspect a car for someone I would prioritize inspecting the common failure points. A tune without a heads up would pass just about everyone without blatant CEL codes, and even then.... A hole in the exhaust is not routine (aside from when the muffler leaks out insulation material). A PPI will most likely not catch the outliers. Nobody is going to inspect every single surface for a car they aren't personally buying, and even then that isn't possible without disassembling things like Vrsurgeon said. My only issue from what I skimmed over is them not reading the clutch life without being told to.
@collegeboy Sorry this has tainted the buying experience for you. Hopefully all is this resolved without the saga that our buddy Rob is going though.
Hi Mike, Bummer to hear your PPI didn't turn out well. Mine wasn't all that great either - hence I did a Post Purchase Inspection - but I'll open up about that PPI on another thread more specific to that shop at another time. I honestly just lucked out with my car, so far...so knocks on wood From my understanding, the PPI is only as good as you - the buyer - want it to be so I did my due diligence and emailed them a complete list of ALL the things that need to be checked from the car. Very detailed and full transparency. Once they confirm and gave a price, I would expect they did not miss any of those along with all the standard stuff that they do specific to your car model. I asked for a sample PPI that they recently did so I can see the level of detail and what I can expect for my own PPI. Of course, a PPI isn't the end all, be all of a car purchase decision but it is a service you pay for because the outcome heavily affects your decision, and to some degree, the negotiating factor with the person or dealership you are purchasing the car from. You are essentially relying on their expertise and knowledge to factor into your purchasing decision. With that being said, if you felt the PPI failed you, you shouldn't feel bad to present your frustration and see what they'll be willing to do about it. Keep it open-ended. Either they can offer to refund you, pay for parts, or something of that nature if they care enough about their reputation.
One thing which is typically missed during PPI is finding any re-paint jobs (which translates into finding previous accidents or body damages). In some countries it's obvious and given to check the paint with electronic paint thickness gauge (capable of reading on both aluminum and steel) before buying a car. In USA I'm still to find a dealer or a body shop which would not be surprised by my questions about paint thickness reading. After buying an out of state car with a repainted fender (certified all original paint by a body shop not affiliated with the selling dealer) I'm not taking any chances and I always ship (loan) a paint thickness gauge to any inspector looking at a car I'm considering to buy. That, plus a detailed list of things to check, as posted above, should increase the chances of a successful PPI.
Interesting...I too had "issues" with my PPI, done by a reputable Indy Shop, when purchasing my CS. The brake wear and clutch readings were not provided until I asked. I got a few pics of the underside showing some front bumper scrapes, some fender lining rock chips/wear, and compression numbers. When I picked up the car the alarm led was on all the time (had to teach the "knowledgeable tech" how that works), it was leaking oil from the valve covers, and the front caliper pistons were starting to pit/corrode causing the brakes to bind occasionally. I have seen better inspections done on Chevrolets when trading them in. I learned not all PPIs are the same and before you go through with it, make sure you and the shop have a clear understanding of your expectations. -Matt
So far I have uncovered possible hidden electrical gremlins since the car was new burning through one TCU so far, power windows not really working most of the time, parts held on with hot glue, no transmission oil in the transmission (0.5q), over filled oil, timing not within spec, failed motor mounts, vacuum leaks causing all the dynamic flaps to not operate at all, stripped and mangled bolts and threads everywhere, missing bolts on transmission, no reverse lights at all no matter swapped relays or fuses. The list goes on and on. I am fixing everything, weather it is me or a shop I pay. This **** is finally getting made right on this poor car! Cauley Ferrari of Detroit and Ferrari of San Antonio are the ONLY TWO SHOPS that worked on this car since new and their work is below what I have seen at the most basic of automotive shops in my life. In fact, it is the worst quality work I've ever seen on a used car I've bought in my entire life and that's about 30 cars. insane. It will feel nice to fix all their wrongs though.
Another vote for mine was quite less than stellar Has anyone had a good PPI? Ie, issues caught, price renegotiated as a result, or repairs performed, or at least knowing what you're getting yourself into?
Keep it up, and keep posting! I reluctantly sold my CS last year, so I'm living vicariously through you. -Matt
Oh dude, it’s a car I’m keeping for life. Started discussions now and if I can’t resolve these issues soon myself, the car is going to an amazing shop on the west coast for them to finally just make the car right. Electronics. While there I’ll just go ahead and pay for a major service, fixing the timing, and might as well toss in the clutch at the same time too. Expensive, but I just want to be done so I can drive it. I want to work on it myself as things wear out and do maintenance. With hat said, I did not sign up buying a car that literally can’t pass inspection as soon as it arrived to me and isn’t street legal. With a few businesses, a happy wife, and little kids, I simply can’t continue spending all my days in the garage fixing problems that really never should have been sold to me. Thanks for the kind words. It will be fixed. All of it. Image Unavailable, Please Login