LaFerrari Specs | FerrariChat

LaFerrari Specs

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by arakisfilip, Mar 7, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. arakisfilip

    arakisfilip Formula Junior

    Jan 25, 2004
    295
    Sorry to start another thread, but it seemed appropriate to keep this info in one place..

    Can we make a collage of all the know/confirmed specs that we are aware of. Ferrari is still being way to criptic about the car.. We still don't know the battery capacity, for how long does one full discharge cycle last.(ie how long will you have 163 electric hp at your disposal onece you plant your foot down in). also the weight is semi unknown, as well as the drag coeficient and downforce.. basicly we don't know much more now then we did before launch. except how it looks and is called.

    Here are the specs from the site..

    HY-KERS system

    Total maximum power
    963 CV
    Total maximum torque
    >900 Nm
    V12 maximum power*
    800 CV @9000 rpm
    Maximum revs
    9250 rpm
    V12 maximum torque
    700 Nm @6750 rpm
    Electric motor output
    120 Kw (163 CV)
    CO2 emissions**
    330 g/km

    Performance

    Maximum speed
    over 350 km/h
    0-100 km/h
    <3 sec
    0-200 km/h
    <7 sec
    0-300 km/h
    15 sec

    ICE

    Type
    65-deg. V12
    Bore and stroke
    94 x 752 mm
    Total displacement
    6262 cc
    Compression ratio
    13.5:1
    Specific power
    128 CV/l

    Dimensions

    Length
    4702 mm
    Width
    1992 mm
    Height
    1116 mm
    Wheelbase
    2665 mm
    Weight distribution
    41% fr, 59% r

    Gearbox

    7-speed DCT

    Suspension

    Front
    double wishbones
    Rear
    multi-link

    Tyres(Pirelli P-Zero)

    Front
    265/30 - 19
    Rear
    345/30 - 20

    Carbon ceramic brakes (Brembo)

    Front
    398 x 223 x 36 mm
    Rear
    380 x 253 x 34 mm

    Electronic controls

    ESC
    stability control
    High performance ABS/EBD
    Sistema frenata anti bloccaggio prestazionale /electronic brake balance
    EF1-Trac
    F1 electronic traction control integrated with the hybrid system
    E-Diff 3
    third generation electronic differential
    SCM-E Frs
    magnetorheological damping with twin solenoids (Al-Ni tube)
    Aerodynamics
    active

    We hear the (i gues curb) weight will be around 1350kg(same as enzos ?). the Aero section says the drag coefficient is close to 3. The battery capacity is said to hold 40 traditional batteries.. from this if we use even the lowest possible battery 45Ah that;s 40x45Ah 1.8kA at 12V which is 21.6KWh and this figure makes no sence at all as even the most efficent Li Ion batteries only have around 265Wh per kg, which comes out to ~16KWh at 60kg.. the figure also doesn't make sence if we know Porsche has only 6.8Kwh and is much heavier..
     
  2. ferrari_envy

    ferrari_envy Karting

    Sep 5, 2009
    68
    I'm pretty new to these electrical jargon.

    Just when you thought you understood cars, they introduce wattage, amps and voltages.
     
  3. arakisfilip

    arakisfilip Formula Junior

    Jan 25, 2004
    295
    Relativly simple :)

    P = I x U
    P = Power, I = Current, U = Voltage

    P x t = E
    t = time, E = Energy...
    Since batteries are ratied in Ah which is Ixt you get that (Ixt) X U = Pxt => E = IxUxt...

    P.S. here is why engineers will never have more money then business men
    1.Everyone knows that money = time
    2.Everyone knows that knowledge = power

    Since Time = Work / Power

    Money = Work / Knowledge
     
  4. werewolf

    werewolf F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 29, 2007
    11,022
    Full Name:
    goodbye
    #4 werewolf, Mar 7, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2013
    LaFerrari battery pack weighs 60kg.

    Let's assume Lithium energy density of 1 MegaJoule per kilogram (not quite best possible), this means LaFerrari battery energy storage of approx 60MJ.

    This means that the batteries (fully charged) can provide the specified 120kW (160hp) for a time period of 500 seconds ... or just over 8 minutes.

    Even if we provide a significant de-rating factor (taking into account temperature, long term reliability, etc), and say that the batteries can only store 0.5 MJ per kg, then we still conclude that the batteries can supply the specified 120kW (160hp) for 4 minutes.

    Sounds fine to me !!! :)

    EDIT : there's no track in the world where you can drive for 4 minutes without a braking event for recharging. Ferrari's battery pack sounds plenty big to me ...
     
  5. arakisfilip

    arakisfilip Formula Junior

    Jan 25, 2004
    295
    That would still imply that even at 30 MJ. te ferrari would have 8+ KWh, then I am wondering how in the hell does porsche only have 6.8KWh for a car wiht twice as much electric power, and weighs 300kg more.. something is way off here... My guess is the quoted 60kg is for the entire battery pack cooling and pumps and all. IMO more realistic figyre is ~60-100 sec of full blast... Which is more then fine :D

    Because I love the way ferrari through out fuel consumption to the wind and engages and uses the engine to charge the batteries at every opertunity, basicly the engine is working full on most of the time... while the turbo boost is being recharged at every non full throtle moment love it..

    relatively easy to do if fly by wire is used. when the driver lifts his foot of the gas insted of cuting flow to the engine, you activate the generator to start slowing the engine down...thus emulating a lifted foot of the accel..

    I do hower worry about what the heck will happen when a transistor decides do go haywire..:D

    The risk of fires and electronics related crashes just went up a few percent with these cars..
     
  6. crinoid

    crinoid F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 2, 2005
    9,873
    Full Name:
    LaCrinoid
    A thread with facts? Weird...
     
  7. werewolf

    werewolf F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 29, 2007
    11,022
    Full Name:
    goodbye
    could very well be ... 60kg might include cooling and packaging
    absolutely agree. Unlike the competition, Ferrari didn't try to store enough KERS energy to be able to drive on electric alone for xx miles, or yy minutes. That's a DUMB goal for a hypercar, IMHO ... no need to make your hypercar a little bit like a Toyota Prius or Chevy Volt, just for silly marketing reasons :rolleyes: In fact, this is the single BEST thing about LaFerrari KERS : single-minded focus :)

    Instead, Ferrari focused on enough electric energy to improve laptimes ... so even 100 seconds or maybe 2 minutes of 160hp "boost" is probably more than adequate for most tracks (won't go that long without a braking event for at least partial recharging).
    I hear you ... the cars have definitely gotten more "electronically complex", and that worries me too (and I'm an electrical engineer!). But i said that when the industry moved to fuel injection, touch-screen controls, etc etc
     
  8. jcosta79

    jcosta79 Formula 3

    Nov 15, 2011
    1,368
    Dallas, TX
    Full Name:
    LaJonathan
    +1

    Mods, please remove this thread.
     
  9. Noblesse Oblige

    Noblesse Oblige F1 Veteran

    Nov 7, 2011
    6,114
    Three Places
    I would take 0.4 MJ/kg for the energy density of the Li battery. Also figure at least 10% losses in electrical delivery. But it is still meaningful energy as you point out.

    A note in passing. Gasoline has an energy density of close to 50 MJ per kg, more than 100 x a Li battery. It is the best battery known to humans. That is one reason why the pure electric car is dumb.
     
  10. arakisfilip

    arakisfilip Formula Junior

    Jan 25, 2004
    295
    Fellow EE, nice :D
     
  11. Gmaccormack

    Gmaccormack Formula Junior

    Nov 30, 2010
    763
    Exactly how many threads do we need sharing the exact same info?
     
  12. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    104,750
    Vegas baby
    Oh man... now I'm sorry I flunked High School physics.
     
  13. jcosta79

    jcosta79 Formula 3

    Nov 15, 2011
    1,368
    Dallas, TX
    Full Name:
    LaJonathan
    Apparently 17 or so.
     
  14. Gmaccormack

    Gmaccormack Formula Junior

    Nov 30, 2010
    763
    There are 2 registry/where are cars going threads. None have even been sold yet. This is getting out of hand.
     
  15. jcosta79

    jcosta79 Formula 3

    Nov 15, 2011
    1,368
    Dallas, TX
    Full Name:
    LaJonathan
    Getting? LOL
     
  16. crinoid

    crinoid F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 2, 2005
    9,873
    Full Name:
    LaCrinoid
    They're all sold.
     
  17. Noblesse Oblige

    Noblesse Oblige F1 Veteran

    Nov 7, 2011
    6,114
    Three Places
    The official LaFerrari site Design | LaFerrari ? Official Site acknowledges the influence of the 330P4 and 312P, but not the P4/5. It also contains interesting data.

    For example the dimensions given show that LaFerrari is exactly the same length as Enzo (4702 mm, or 185.1 inches). LaFerrari is actually slightly narrower at 78.4 inches vs. 80.1, and is yet lower at 43.9 inches vs 45.2 for the Enzo. The suspension is conventional with double wishbones in front and a multilink rear. They claim a greatly reduced braking distance (30 m less from 200 km/hr) via super lightweight Brembos. The horsepower figure for the engine includes an unspecified amount of ram effect.

    The site is worth going through for those interested in information on the car.
     
  18. arakisfilip

    arakisfilip Formula Junior

    Jan 25, 2004
    295
    ok it's been more htan a week, any more info released? battery specs, officeial weight, lap times..
     
  19. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,299
    Bournemouth, UK
    Nope. I wouldn't expect anything soon either...
     
  20. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    You can't calculate with the traditional Lead acid values (12V). 265Wh/kg is for experimental cells at cell level, if you take real production cells and put a housing around them and add a cooling system, you end up at ~75Wh/kg on the system level. I expect the battery to have 2-4kWh if it weighs 60kg.
     
  21. 250P

    250P Formula Junior

    Aug 8, 2011
    756
    London, England
    Full Name:
    Alex
    And they'll need to limit discharge to leave about 30% in the battery for longevity, unlike gas.
     
  22. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    Usually you have a charging window for optimizing battery life. The Prius II for example operates between 40% and 70% of the installed capacity, if I remember my colleagues' measurement correctly.

    (Of course the display shows 100% and 0% to the driver at the real 70% and 40% values).
     
  23. AlexO91

    AlexO91 F1 Rookie

    Sep 26, 2008
    2,909
    NW England
    Full Name:
    Alex
    Does anyone know if all 449 LaFerrari's are sold?
     

Share This Page