Have any of you even read the article? Lmao. He is factually correct in his assesment. On Vettel – he only said what many people already are thinking. If you consider the top 6 drivers at the moment (Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel, Rosberg, Ricciardo, Button), Hamilton has beaten 3 of them and Vettel lost to one of them.
Hey yeah.....you're right.....Lewis wins his championships in a car with a huge performance advantage, and so does Vettel! wait......what's your point?
^^^^of course you'd agree, but you fail to admit the same criticism of Lewis. Let's see how he goes in a car that's not dominant. We've seen that Schumacher, Alonso, Senna, etc etc also don't win regularly in a non dominant car, but at least they managed unbelievable things occasionally....Vettel MAYBE did that at Monza....Lewis has never done it. Actually, thinking about it, considering how much slower all the other cars are compared to Mercedes, the fact that Vettel has won anything this year is an amazing effort....never mind 3 races!
Did you even read the statement by GodSpeed33 ??? Take off your blinders for a minute try, if you can, to comprehend what someone is saying before spewing your crap at every opportunity G
yes I did....and answered appropriately. Did you read it? Looks like you didn't. I stand by my comment......the criticism Lewis made about Vettel is the same criticism everyone makes about Lewis. (as far as driving goes, that is)
What is this criticism you are on about that everyone makes about Lewis?, please do carry on I' am enjoying this.
OMG....just read the thread!!!! *shakes head* seriously....just read! it's all there already. It's like you come into a thread, read a post or two, and just jump in with both feet in your mouth! There's no other explanation as to why you ask questions to things that have already been explained.
You have not answered the question what is wrong with you, do you want me to write it out again, I did not think Godspeed or Cig were agreeing with you, so I'am cutting you some slack, so why not just answer the question, is it a problem, why evade it, if you feel you are right.
I'am glad the forum can now see that you cannot back up your statements. Makes me wonder why you continue, but as I said be my guest.
krafty....are you losing the plot? what do you mean? you've asked questions and I've answered. what more are you looking for? I think you're being a troublemaker. Why else would you keep asking the questions I've already answered and speak in this demeaning manner?
I asked you a simple civil question, why it that demeaning?, and why I have I lost the plot, you need to be careful getting personal. I find it rather ironic that you of all people mention trouble making.
I said "are you losing the plot"...so good try!! it's not the question that's demeaning. As pap would say "wake up to yourself" Read the thread....you'll see I've answered all your leading questions already.
I'll answer your question then, I'll show you how it's done. Yes I'am losing the plot, otherwise I wouldn't waste my time knocking when there is no one in.
Apparently Rosberg is driving for many races with reduced power to be able to survive the season on 4 PUs after one was damaged in Monza. I think I also read that he finished his last 'Friday' unit in Brazil and needs to now use his race motor on Friday, too. Very interesting and this might explain much more why Hamilton was so eager to go for a different strategy in Brazil. While passing on track is so difficult, he might have thought that he could have mounted higher pressure in clean air. Rosberg was not written about as being super optimistic about the Abu Dhabi GP as it is a power track and his deficit might make a defence much more difficult. Impressive that, despite reduced power, he had a solid upper hand in the recent races. It would be great if he could cruise into 2016 on this high and make it a thrilling season.
I don't believe that for a second. Maybe they turn the power down slight on both cars when he's cruising at the front but that would be about all
