If someone at this point doesn't know F1 has always had dominant cars, you haven't watched F1 in years.
Ummm, I think what he is saying is that George seems as good as Hamilton and it is the car, not the driver. As for Bottas, he is a mid packer that the car flatters.
I find it funny that people needed "proof" that it is the car behind Merc dominance. It is the car, always has been, always will be; Schumacher and Senna would have 0 WDC if they didn't have the best car or close to it (as talented as they were).
I know I dont that the same way you don't known he wouldn't. Making the lock up bigger? Leclerc locked up and he was not in full control of his vehicle. Perez was in control of his vehicle. He sure did come into the apex. I want to see the replay of it again.
When Russell gets to Aitken, he'll lap his own car. That'll feel weird. Edit: nevermind, lapped him when Aitken pitted. All the best, Andrew.
Right F1 has never seen favoritism, Schumacher was treated like a dog all his years and sometimes was told to let Barrichello by lol!!!
I know. It's not looking good for Hamilton when it comes to contract negotiations. Toto is probably asking himself why does he need to pay Hamilton and Bottas so much. Not that they should be replaced, but why pay them such a premium.
I love seeing Stroll in 3rd...but I can visualize his pit stop, tyre compound change, and decline to finish race in 12th.
If someone at this point doesn't know LH44 has been guaranteed to win in F1 by the powers-that-be, you haven't watched F1 in years.
Honestly, it's pointless at this point. That was a racing incident and none of the drivers' should get any penalties. Verstappen, Perez and Leclerc are all agressive wheel-to-wheel drivers, there was a 80% chance this kind of thing would happen at the start and it did.