Clutch pressure plate to flywheel clearance | FerrariChat

Clutch pressure plate to flywheel clearance

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by P400, Apr 15, 2011.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. P400

    P400 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2005
    535
    east coast
    Full Name:
    Craig
    #1 P400, Apr 15, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I have a newly rebuilt pressure plate (actually it appears to be a resurfaced plate with all else cleaned to new), renewed friction disc (appears to be new friction material riveted to cleaned up oem disc), and a new flywheel.

    The clearance with the new pressure plate to flywheel is .200", .220", .220" when checked at three equal clocked location.
    The new disc is .350" thick with new lining.

    Are these numbers for clearance too high , meaning .220 with .350 new disc?
    thanks
    Craig
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    28,563
    socal
    huh? What you askin? Anyway, street clutch plates have compressed and uncompressed thickness spec in your WSM because of the marcel spring. There is a wear/thickness spec for your PP and FW. The throwout bearing system free floats and the disc to plates gap will settle to their own free places like your brake pads do on your brake calipers UNLESS there is improper factory spec for the uncompressed/compressed plate thickness. This is often a problem when getting plates resurfaced even those experienced like Friction materials co. because they are 100% lazy and you always have to check their work. A plate that is too think will not allow clutch release. A plate too thin will either slip immediately or have a very short life. So read your WSM! Hope that helps.
     
  3. P400

    P400 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2005
    535
    east coast
    Full Name:
    Craig
    I had not realized how difficult this was to explain.
    No manuals to reference this clutch, there are no recorded specs.
    .220" clearance between new flywheel and rebuilt pressure plate.
    clutch plate newly lined with .350" thickness when marcel spring is compressed simply using dial caliper.

    What would an owner normally find to be acceptable dimensions when fitting new clutch.
    For instance - isn't a friction disc normally between .330" and .360" when new or rebuilt?
    Certainly a friction disc, in this style clutch, wouldn't be .500" or .125".
    So my main concern is the PP to FW clearance for this disc, in this style Fitchel & Sachs PP.
    Any help here would be wonderful.
     
  4. 2NA

    2NA F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 29, 2006
    18,221
    Twin Cities
    Full Name:
    Tim Keseluk
    I think there are too many variables to give you an opinion. It seems like it's all about clamping force versus enough travel for a clean release. Have you tried the manufacturer for that information?

    What is it for?
     
  5. MiuraP400

    MiuraP400 Formula Junior

    Feb 3, 2008
    949
    Arizona
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Craig,

    The gap is not really that important. Below is the formula you need to see if it will work.

    Torque that a clutch can transmit :

    T = NfFR

    T = torque in ft lbs
    N = number of friction surfaces
    f = coefficient of friction (.25 for stock, 0.32 for copper-ceramic, 0.5-1.2 for carbon composite materials)
    F = Clamping force in pounds
    R = radius in feet (inside radius + outside radius)/2

    Target between 1.25 to 1.5 times the peak torque rating of the engine for the amount of torque the clutch can transmit.

    Instead of measuring the gap, you need to measure the clamping force. Note it will be pretty stout, I did not run the numbers but expect it to be in the 800 to 1600 lb range.

    Don't forget the marcel spring will be compressed at the height you are looking for the clamp load.

    Cheers Jim
     
  6. P400

    P400 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2005
    535
    east coast
    Full Name:
    Craig
    Hi fbb, thanks for the input. What are the acceptable clutch friction plate dimensions for any 60's era street Ferrari?
    thanks
     
  7. P400

    P400 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2005
    535
    east coast
    Full Name:
    Craig
    Tim, thanks for your input. Not sure it is that complex, simply not common knowledge.
    Street driven Ferrari of the 60's would seem to have similar needs.... friction disc thickness, clamping force, throw out travel, finger height, pressure plate clearance, etc.
     
  8. P400

    P400 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2005
    535
    east coast
    Full Name:
    Craig
    Jim, thanks for your input, but I don't think you would hand a customer a pencil and paper and tell them they should be able to calculate the quality of the latest clutch install.
    The gap and disc thickness are the only two important items you could discuss, both before and after.
    I realize the typical shop answer is "I always use (insert the company name of a clutch rebuilder) cause they always do quality work and i have never had a problem".

    I realize this subject is easily diverted with throw out bearing considerations, finger height, number of springs in the PP, spring rates, friction numbers, material of construction, RPM, horsepower, some companys racing clutch, Marcel springs, PP straps.....but they are diversions from what is actually, practically important....and that is

    The gap and the friction disc thickness.

    At least I think so.
    Would we say " i dont check bearing clearances cause i always use GT Car Parts and they always send me the right stuff"
    Cheers Craig
     
  9. 2NA

    2NA F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 29, 2006
    18,221
    Twin Cities
    Full Name:
    Tim Keseluk
    The information you are looking for is something a clutch manufacturer would use. It's not something I've seen as a spec for an "end user". I've had clutches rebuilt and took relative measurements before sending the parts out in case I had issues later but it never was a problem.

    Checking bearing clearances is an entirely different thing and is part of the engine building process regardless of where you bought the parts or who did the machine work.
     
  10. P400

    P400 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2005
    535
    east coast
    Full Name:
    Craig
    Tim, Jim, fbb, your answers are always appreciated. Thanks for participating.
    I dont believe a clutch manufacturer, rebuilder, aftermarket upgrade company has this information as technical big secret. I am beginning to suspect that this information is not requested by the SFB customer, so why be concerned about it? Way too complex I would assume, what with springs involved and all. LOL
    thanks
    Craig
     
  11. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    28,563
    socal
    There is no such thing. The WSM has the specs for any car based on OEM dimensions and OEM parts. A plate on a 250 gt would have specific dimensions to match the required set-up height of the system of FW,PP and trhow of the T/O bearing. Varying from OEM you can have a thinner plate if say someone brass faced the FW to thicker than OEM dimensions but the overall package still needs to fit. You can do thinks like improve hard connection to the driveline by deleting marcel springs but the spec compressed needs to be kept. Once you go out of OEM like say put a multi plate Tilton Clutch package on a home made 308 racecar, Tilton would do all the math to fit the clutch pack into the space available and for their T/O bearing set-up for the most unlimited sytem. They could also build within the throw of the OEM T/O bearing depending on available parts, conditions, and costs. Sometimes it is just cheaper and better to have a full tilton system for example. Still I'm not sure what you are tyring to do or what specific question you are asking.
     
  12. 335s

    335s Formula Junior

    Jan 17, 2007
    870
    SF Bay Area
    Full Name:
    T. Monma
    P400...I'm making a clutch(clutches actually) out of 4340 billet logs for a couple of ex works cars(multi disc, "birdcage types")...that said, I have not got a clue what you are talking about!

    This is when text books usually are getting in the way of practical applications...it is-in my own experience-usually best NOT to try and reinvent the wheel.
    Your pic looks like a std re-man 250 clutch...no?

    If so, be happy, install it, and drive it...
    Likely that it will fail due to oil surface contamination from leaks far before "pre-mature"wear...honestly..
    You will NOT get the service life from these sorts of parts thAt you will get from a NAPA clutch for a Camry!!!

    If for a 250, the truth ius that you are not likely much above 200HP, certainly not above 250HP in the REAL world...that said, "adult" style driving habits ought to yield many miles of adequate service life from the unit which you've illustrated in picture,
    ciao!
     
  13. MiuraP400

    MiuraP400 Formula Junior

    Feb 3, 2008
    949
    Arizona
    Full Name:
    Jim
    #13 MiuraP400, Apr 17, 2011
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2011
    To get back to your basic question, 0.35 - 0.22 = 0.13 compression on the clutch disc, seems to be in the ballpark of what I have seen building clutches. Never actually measured it before, but it seems the pressure plate always has about an 1/8 inch gap before you have to start torqueing the bolts.

    Typically you never measure this though. If the clutch guy has done his job you just bolt it on and go. Technically he should have run the calculations. I was under the impression you wanted to double check the clutch guys work.

    Cheers Jim
     

Share This Page