400i vs. 412 Engine Block/Heads | FerrariChat

400i vs. 412 Engine Block/Heads

Discussion in '365 GT4 2+2/400/412' started by blkprlz, Oct 29, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. blkprlz

    blkprlz Formula 3

    Mar 24, 2007
    2,169
    Tampa bay
    Full Name:
    Bruce
    I'm on a roll with these threads but I'll stop after this one. I've had these questions for quite some time but I believe no one has brought them up :confused: :(

    To start with, the only difference between the 400/400i & the 412 bore & stroke figures is the increase of 1mm on the bore of the 412. Figuring that to hone 1/2mm off the liners is a realistically doable option, Colombo/Ferrari wouldn't have developed a different block for
    a mere 576 cars because of this 1mm bore difference would they??
    Additionally, there was a difference in compression between the 400/400i & the 412, the 412's was increased to 9.6 to 1 from the
    earlier 8.8 to 1. I'm figuring that would merely lie with the piston/head configuration. Wouldn't it be an easy conversion to bore out the 400 liners by 1mm & toss in the 412 pistons &/or heads?
    I read somewhere that the 25 HP increase of the 412 over the Series 2 400i was due to increased displacement (1mm bore X 12 jugs) &
    remapped fuel injection (whatever that is in simple K-Jet terms :confused: I really don't understand what they meant by that!!).
    I'm also thinking the exhaust might have had a freer flowing mid-section on the 412 with less back-pressure. We all know that the rated HP on our engines isn't achieved until redline & any significant back-pressure @ the high end is going to snuff out HP :(

    I also read somewhere that the 412 heads were interchangeable with the Testarossa heads, & that it would make for an interesting transformation for the 412...netting another 50 HP (to 390 bhp :eek:). That would seriously smoke some TRX's :cool:

    I'm figuring this is 'the' only option if you're breaking down & rebuilding a motor when the costs of doing so are up there.
     
  2. islerodreaming

    islerodreaming Formula 3

    Aug 11, 2007
    1,694
    Full Name:
    John - a proud Australian man
     
  3. 180 Out

    180 Out Formula 3

    Jan 4, 2012
    1,274
    San Leandro, CA
    Full Name:
    Bill Henley
    I would not expect that a 200 cc/12 cubic inch increase in displacement would add more than 10 to 12 horsepower. But the increase in compression ratio from 8.8:1 to 9.6:1 could very well account for the rest of the 412's increase of 25 hp over the 400.

    Also, consider this: that increasing displacement by 12 cc per cylinder might be enough to boost the compression from 8.8 to 9.6 all by itself. Assuming a flat top piston, compression ratio = volume of the cylinder (1/2 bore x 1/2 bore x stroke x 3.142) + volume of compressed head gasket + volume of combustion chamber, divided by volume of head gasket + combustion chamber. The 12 cc increase in displacement goes in the numerator, while the head gasket and combustion chamber volumes stay the same. The larger numerator results in a larger quotient.

    If the 400 uses a dished piston, going to a smaller dish or a flat top will also boost compression.

    To my way of thinking, horsepower is a measurement of an engine's ability to make torque at high rpm. Cylinder pressure is what makes torque. Starting out with higher cylinder pressure, prior to combustion -- through increased compression ratio or through supercharging -- results in higher cylinder pressure during combustion.

    So what I'm saying is that a simple increase in displacement, without anything more, could add 25 hp. Better breathing heads would have an even greater impact, but 12 extra cubes and a 0.8 point increase in CR could do it without more.

    P.S. About that exhaust system back pressure, I already mentioned in the thread about the 400's header pipe "horns" that this is misconception. I just Googled "exhaust back pressure myth" and got a bunch of hits. Here is one source that seems to get a lot of citations: http://www.thumpertalk.com/topic/571594-exhaust-backpressure-the-myth/
     
  4. 180 Out

    180 Out Formula 3

    Jan 4, 2012
    1,274
    San Leandro, CA
    Full Name:
    Bill Henley
    After I posted the previous post, I realized that, if we assume a flat top piston, we can calculate the volume of the combustion chamber and head gasket for the 400 and 412 by working backwards from the known quantities: displacement and CR. For the displacement volumes I used the figures provided by http://www.ferrari400.com/History.aspx .

    For the 400, if "N" represents the combustion chamber volume plus the compressed head gasket volume, CR is 8.8, and cylinder displacement is 400 cc, the formula is 8.8 = (401.93 + N)/N. Solving for N gives us 51.53 cc.

    For the 412, the formula is 9.6 = (411.93 + N)/N. N = 47.90 cc.

    The 3.63 cc difference between the 400 and the 412 indicates that either the 412 heads have a smaller volume, or the pistons are different.

    Here's a really good article about exhaust theory from the American hot rod magazine Popular Hot Rodding: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/enginemasters/articles/hardcore/0505em_exh/viewall.html . The author David Vizard is on the faculty of a university in North Carolina, whose name escapes me.
     
  5. Ak Jim

    Ak Jim F1 Veteran
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 23, 2007
    9,388
    North Pole AK
    Our engines use a true hemispherical combustion chamber. The pistons are domed to fit into the combustion chambers. When I say a true hemispherical it is in comparison to semi hemispherical chambers like is used on Chrysler products.
     
  6. hoverland

    hoverland Formula Junior

    Aug 14, 2010
    265
    Norway
    Full Name:
    Harald Ø
    #6 hoverland, Oct 30, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    "We all know" ? -not so sure.
    The HP from these engines is pretty much present from approx 5000rpm and up to redline.
    Dyno pic below is from my stock -77, carburetted 400 Auto, original SS exhaust system.

    Enzo's words "Torque wins races" is easy to understand when you study the red torque curve.
    These cars/engines are amazing when well maintained :)

    Harald
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  7. 275gt

    275gt Rookie

    Dec 26, 2005
    16
    Does anyone know if the 365/400/412 engine is derived from the Lampredi engine? Were the heads redesigned to use side draught carburettors?
     
  8. 180 Out

    180 Out Formula 3

    Jan 4, 2012
    1,274
    San Leandro, CA
    Full Name:
    Bill Henley
    I'm not knowing what is meant by "Lampredi engine." But what I've read about the 365 GTC/4 engine is that the bean counters wanted to use a wet sump oiling system to save a few lira, that the taller wet sump oil pan combined with the intake ports and carburetors in the engine valley would make the engine too tall, and that the solution was to route the intake ports between the camshafts and use side draft carbs. That's the legend, anyway.
     
  9. blkprlz

    blkprlz Formula 3

    Mar 24, 2007
    2,169
    Tampa bay
    Full Name:
    Bruce
    I believe the story goes that Enzo used Colombo for his Tipo 125 engine (the little 1.5 liter V12) up to the 3.3 liter road & endurance race cars (some 15 yrs) but failed to perform well when used in the F1 cars. Enzo then brought on Lampredi to develop the F1 engines. Lampredi also designed some America's & Superamerica car engines, but so did Colombo. The Colombo engine was the primarily used for the road cars from the 125's to the 250's, 275's, 330's, & finally the 365/400/412.

    I'm pretty sure that went hand in hand with the wet & dry sump versions. The down drafts were used on the dry sump versions, where as the wet sump with down drafts were too tall to fit under the hood...so the side drafts were implemented. Down drafts on a dry sump yields better performance along with lowered center of gravity for increased handling/higher skidpad g's.
     
  10. bundas

    bundas F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Dec 31, 2005
    7,090
    lexington ky usa
    Full Name:
    mitchell barnes
    the two 365 motors I am having rebuilt will have higher compression pistons. at this point I am not sure what it will be. will find out
     

Share This Page