Scarcity is overrated. There are a lot of scarce cars, including some Ferraris, nobody wants to buy. For a car, including a Ferrari, to appreciate, it needs to have been loved from the get go. Said another way, F40s are not scarce, yet they're desirable cars.
I don't think it will matter with F355s and F360s. Both were entry-level Ferraris. Ferrari sold more F360s because more people liked them.
This is true. Parameters (Around under 3,000 created) obtained for under 100K (assuming one is okay with a Grade 1 car) Model - Production # 400 (5sp) = 147 208 GTS = 160 208 GTB = 208 208 GTS turbo = 250 412 (5sp) = 270 412 (A) = 306 400 (A) = 355 456 GTA = 403 400i (A) = 422 208 GTB turbo = 437 308 GTBi = 494 365 (5sp) = 524 Mondial QV Cab = 629 456M GTA = 650 456M GT = 688 Mondial 8 = 703 Mondial 3.2 Cab = 810 208 GT4 = 840 Mondial t Coupe = 858 400i (5sp) = 883 Mondial 3.2 = 987 Mondial t Cab = 1,017 Mondial QV = 1,145 456 GT = 1,548 308 GTSi = 1743 308 GT4 = 2,826 308 GTB = 2,897 Although I would gladly buy a 412i 5 speed, 456M 6 speed or Mondial t Coupe at the right price.
I had an F355 with the 5.2 ignition. Compared to my 360 it felt very slow. I am informed it is that ignition. I much prefer my 360 in every way now. I even think it looks nicer - sssshhhhh
Funny, the different opinions here. To me, the 355 is one of the greatest looking Ferrari production models ever, while the 360/430 are utterly dull and passionless. I suppose there isn't a right answer. It's whatever appeals to you.
In terms of investment value, I find it hard to believe at the current valuations that the CS is a good buy. I should have bought one at $100k when I could have as it turns out that would have been a good decision. But at todays asking prices of over double that amount does it seem more likely they will appreciate or depreciate? Then consider that a real challenge 360 can be had for $75k. That seems to be the much better purchase as an investment.
As with art, your opinion is just as valid as any others. I personally like the 348/F355 series more, but I 100% respect your opinion because it is above all - honest.
I think it will, in the end, come down to aesthetics. If you prefer the look of the CS vs the Scud - it will be the 'better' LE car of that gen.
Can't legally drive a Challenge car on the street. Even if you do, it is a horrible experience. Challenge cars have zero ground clearance. CSs are trading around MSRP. I predict they will go higher.
"I was not able to resolve the issue with the evidence available." This has become my credo. Then I just move on.
Interesting views across the board. The "appreciating" element of OP is a "would be nice" scenario really - part of the overall 'down the pub' chat that our group - like all petrol heads probably - has. We've all been around long enough to put making money out of owning cars firmly into the unlikely category unless you're actually a dealer.
I agree having fun with cars is more important than making money on them. However, for those of us who are not jillionaires, keeping your powder dry is important. I paid $115,000 for a 1998 Maranello in 2003. The PO paid $190,000 and drove the car 800 miles. Even if I could afford that delta, it would impact the enjoyment of the car. Ps. I sold the car for $75,000 in 2008, after spending an additional $20,000 on the car. The good news is I drove it 22,000 miles. But still, $3 a mile hurts.
I feel like such a fool. All this time Ive been making money instead of obeying the norm and losing it.