360 CAT Failure | FerrariChat

360 CAT Failure

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by 4i2fly, Aug 31, 2004.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 4i2fly

    4i2fly Formula 3

    Apr 16, 2004
    1,333
    SF, Bay Area
    I had an earlier post regarding my 360 having knock sensor faults here: http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28156
    After 10 days of diagnosis FoSF has determined the CATs Are to be blamed for the lack of power. I mean the whole thing starting with headers/pre-cat and three way cats are all shot. The stuff has disintegrated inside and was pouring out... At least I am happy to find out what's been the bug up her a$$ but not so thrilled that it is about $17K of parts only repair. I don't know what the labor cost is yet. According to the guys at FoSF since I mix 91 and 100 Octane (7 to 2 parts respectively) I have exposed burning fuel at the exhaust and therefore the cats have burnt or ruined. This doesn't make sense, I do the same thing in my 996 and it has more miles than the 360 and there are no issues. I have read the owners manual regarding the octane rating and there is a mention of min requirement but not max. There is no mention of high octane gas can damage your engine... This just doesn't make sense... Has anyone had any issues with their CATs in their 360s?
     
  2. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,828
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    WOW!! I have never heard of this before. Ferrari has had issues with cats and exahust components from the begining of the 355 run. I appears that they have fail to repaire these issues.

    One thing you may want to check is the warrenty on the exahust/emissions components. The cats should be covered under this warrenty. After all you have done nothing wrong. You have filled your car with the recommned fuel that is available at any gas station across the county. I really can't see how mixing the fuel could really cause this type of failure with the cats. Unless there is a mechanical issue with the car as well that has not been determined like a stuck or leaking injector..AIR system faulty...etc. I would recommend that the dealer find out exactly what caused this to happen. The mixing of the gas sounds sorta fishy.
     
  3. judge4re

    judge4re F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2003
    13,477
    Never home
    Full Name:
    Dr. Dumb Ass
    Can you post pictures of the failed cats? The three main failure modes are:

    1. Plugged - bad fuel additives
    2. Melted - Engine running way rich
    3. Crushed - usually poor assembly

    I kinda do this for a living. :)
     
  4. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    36,756
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall

    Matt, his question is a good one. Get some pictures for your records before those pieces go anywhere.
     
  5. enjoythemusic

    enjoythemusic F1 World Champ

    Apr 20, 2002
    10,676
    Worldwide
    Full Name:
    Steven
    Emissions parts should be under warranty per US law as i recall. If you have a problem with FNA warranty seek a lawyer.
     
  6. thomas_b

    thomas_b Formula Junior

    Sep 15, 2003
    765
    I might add another one – antifreeze/oil/water leaks into the cat

    Since all cats are gone in both banks as it seems that mechanical destruction is unlikely and since they have disintegrated my guess would be fuel in the cat

    When I looked into octane general agreement I found was that more does not harm but also does not help, see http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part1/ for example

    However there is a catch – some of the racing fuel brands have a higher “volatility” and other properties that support racing engines independent of octane – it never became clear to me if that could theoretically harm an engine

    I have used Unlocal 76 100 octane several times on the track in several mixtures up 10 100%. As far as I remember Sunoco (?sp) has a much higher volatility and I did not use it based on my unscientific fear of the unknown.

    Most of the problems I have seen are caused by engines running to rich (e.g. vacuum leaks) so there might be another problem that caused the destruction of the cats (and the knock sensor fault)

    The destruction pattern of the cats should give an expert a good read of what happened. It seems to be best to get hold of the old pieces and start a documentation trail.
     
  7. Lloyd

    Lloyd F1 Rookie

    Aug 25, 2001
    2,714
    Austin
  8. Buttuz4eva

    Buttuz4eva F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Dec 14, 2003
    2,717
    LONG ISLAND N.Y.
    Full Name:
    Challenge Farrelle
    just take them out and go with straight pipes you wont regret it
     
  9. ferrarifixer

    ferrarifixer F1 Veteran
    BANNED

    Jul 22, 2003
    8,520
    Melbourne
    Full Name:
    Phil Hughes
    Can you just clear up the 91/100 thing...are you talking RON or MON?

    But I would say that you can mix any unleaded fuels any way you like and not cause the cat failures you've had.

    Maybe you've got some lead substitute fuel mixed in there, or some other impurity as mentioned already?

    The 360C has cats fitted. They are stock standard road ones and run at incredible temps (visibly glowing at least cherry red, almost transparent at times), without problems.
     
  10. Diablo

    Diablo Formula Junior

    At the track we use 100- 110 octane. No problems.
    As for the the cats. They could be effected by the timing(I.E. Knock sensor).
    If valve timing is affected, you could be dumping fuel into the exhaust.

    Just make sure they check the valve timing and even do a compression and leakdown. I would hate to see the new parts go bad again.

    Good Luck to you.
     
  11. SrfCity

    SrfCity F1 World Champ

    No cat problem here. Yea, Heiko has straight pipes for $539 delivered I think ;) If they won't warranty it might be an idea. Only problem is smog check.
     
  12. 4i2fly

    4i2fly Formula 3

    Apr 16, 2004
    1,333
    SF, Bay Area
    #12 4i2fly, Sep 1, 2004
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I was at the dealer to take some pictures and they are going through FNA to determine the root cause. They are still under the belief that the CATs got destroyed due to high-octane gas, we'll see what FNA says. They will get the parts to Fspa and diagnose meanwhile I am having them fix the car so I can drive it. I am getting jitters and miss driving the car. The left manifold or the pre-CAT is the one that has been deformed in the picture. All of them are loose in the housing and a lot of loose material pours out of them when they are left right side up. The broken material appears to be metallic with edges that may look like broken pieces from the honeycomb. . Thanks for the feedback and appreciate the further comments.

    Edit: I appreciate the suggestion of getting straight pipes and headers instead of the factory component. As much as I love the sound and performance I can't live with the headache of CEL and smog check here in California.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  13. senna21

    senna21 F1 Rookie

    Jul 2, 2004
    3,334
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Charles W
    "Most of the problems I have seen are caused by engines running to rich (e.g. vacuum leaks)"

    A vacuum leak would cause the car to run lean. The AFM measures the air flow and adjust the fuel being delivered to the cylinders based upon that measurement. If there was a leak (extra air being sucked into the intake) the mixture would be too lean. There would be more air flowing into the cylinders than the AFM had calculated for. Thus too little fuel. Too little fuel (lean) creates hot spots on the cylinder walls and pistons. Having those hot spots will also lead to knock (predetonation). You can't burn a piston from having a rich fuel mix because not all the fuel would burn during combustion. It would actually cool the cylinder and help prevent knock. Most ECUs when detecting knock will pull timing and dump extra fuel to cool the cylinders down.

    Good luck on the findings of FNA going your way.
     
  14. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    36,756
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall

    The O2 sensors adjust the mixture to compensate for vacuum leaks. I have seen monsterous vacuum leaks in Ferrari's and the first and only symptom was a check engine light for "O2 sensor operating put of range". It's such a problem on 456's and 550's that I routinely spray carb cleaner around the intake gaskets with the SD2 hooked up and watching the O2's reaction. No that was not caused by a vacuum leak.
     
  15. FourCam

    FourCam Formula Junior

    May 19, 2004
    409
    Loveland CO
    Full Name:
    Cameron MacArthur
    Used to hear the hotrod guys talk about how great their cars ran on Sunoco 260 when it was available--for anything less than about 12 to 1 compression it was a waste of money. It was probably true 102-105 motor octane. If I'm not mistaken, octane is just a measurement of resistance to detonation. The first determinant of octane requirement would be compression ratio, but that would be affected additionally by alot of things like combustion chamber shape, quench area, and camshaft overlap. To blame high-octane gas by itself for this kind of damage is pretty shaky-got to be something else going on like lead-additives or ???...
     
  16. judge4re

    judge4re F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2003
    13,477
    Never home
    Full Name:
    Dr. Dumb Ass
    Take some of the fragments and see if they really are metal (bend them, if they bend, metal, if they snap, ceramic). If I remember correctly, the CC catalyst is a metallic part and the underfloor one is a ceramic.

    Two main root causes for a substrate to fail. The first is improper winding on a metallic part or improper installation of a ceramic part (i.e. not lined up in the can properly). Based on the fact that it seems to have shredded, it doesn't look like this was the cause, but it could have rattled itself apart.

    The second way is "the sumb!tch got hot", indicating that a lot of unburned fuel made it to the cat and ignited. From the pictures, it looks like you have the remains of a blow torch.

    Without getting the part into my hands and really taking a look at it, my best bet is the engine was running way rich. Look upstream of the catalyst for the cause.

    I'm not an expert on the engine management system for this one, so I can't comment on how the engine adjusts for increased octane, but this needs to go back to FNA and FSpA to review.
     
  17. 4i2fly

    4i2fly Formula 3

    Apr 16, 2004
    1,333
    SF, Bay Area
    I took a fragment with me and tried bending it. It is hard but does bend, so it appears to be metallic material.

    Dealer also agrees that the chambers got too hot hence, the precat melt down. They have not changed their stance and still think the root cause is high-octane gas. As Erik indicated a rich fuel/air mixture could be the cause and apparently, the oxygen sensors or the ecu went on operating without noticing a rich mixture and led to system self-destruct.

    I noticed in the '03 owners manual the fuel octane rating for 360 is 93 - 98 RON. Can someone post what would be the approximate octane with R+M/2 method? Thanks in advance.
     

Share This Page