2012 Lexus LFA vs 2010 Nissan GT-R

Still not feeling the GT-R at all. But I must say, for some reason I like that LF-A. It is just priced about $200,000 too high.

 

Yes/ no.

The body on the LFA looks good, but doesn't look exotic. The engine is also too weak for it's price point.

But, the chassis is a thing of beauty, where IMO, only the One-77 looks better with the skin off.

 

The LFA is a toy for the super rich. People with enough money where they already have the Ferraris and Lambo and are curious to see what the LFA is about so $400k is chump change.

I cant imagine anyone making it their primary exotic.

 

it barely beat the GTR in the 1/4 mile. Thats dissappointing.
I expecting more from this "super car".

 

+1 that's a perfect explanation

 

Wow, that was way closer than what I was expecting...

 

Have you seen the chassis of both in the flesh? If so pics are in order

 

For once I agree, and it does not have a double clutch. Sounds SUPERB though.

 

I have similar pictures to this, but the wire frame really takes away from the photos
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

That's the most insulting thing Lexus could do. "Yes, this $400,000 Lexus is the pinnacle of design, engineering, and performance. It's certainly worthy of sharing a price point with a Ferrari 599.... but for $70,000 more we can make it just a liiiiittle bit MORE perfect."

What a joke.

 

Still think the LFA is butt-ugly and I personally think it's overpriced, but my lord does it ever sound fantastic.

 

oh yeah like other makes dont do this?

anyway I still agree w/ you.