http://www.insideline.com/features/100-worst-cars-of-all-time.html At least the Fcars are less worse than the Lambo...take that Jay Leno!
The only purpose these lists serve is to stir a discussion and generate clicks for the (online) magazines creating them.
I would take issue with the inclusion of the Porsche 914, especially the 914-6 with its 911 engine. The styling isn't up to Dino 246 standards, but the reliability, power and handling were ahead of their time, and for vintage racing the 914s are a sweet spot. Otherwise, it's not a very loveable list...
Before blocking traffic a consultant should have been contacted before hand yet the question will remain unknown as too which would have had the 'mojo' to forsee and remedy such a situation??? Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Someone else's thought on the list: http://www.carnewser.com/news/1070536_inside-line-produces-100-worst-cars-list-gets-many-wrong
Wowza... and here I think the Espada is an amazing looking car. It might not photograph well, but certainly seems stunning in person. Would sure take issue with quite a few of those listings, but 4re Nut pretty well took care of that The one I'll add? I think the Pontiac Solstice was one heck of a good looking car - have never driven one, but haven't seen many American cars that have that kind of charisma.
love my 2010 612 HGT2....bought it because of the advice I got on F-Chat.....Inside Line has no idea what they are talking about
Such a silly list, the GT4 , i had one , it was a great car , Quick car with a back seat , i put people back there , the 914 , i never had one , but i like them , i think they were ahead of their time, good handling , + simple to work on , # 100 the Pontiac , i have driven one , it was fun , they look cool IMO , I would buy one after i bought everything else i wanted , The Lamborghini comments were cheap shots , but i like the Maserati Bi turbo so i must be a person who knows very little . Different cars for different people .