Loss of the U.K tipped the balance. Still, saying that because the GDP is high so you can pollute and consume more confirms my point.
If you are truly concerned about pollution, stop buying 300k supercars. You can take that money and help a lot of underserved people and help the environment at the same time.. Also- ride a bike as any car will pollute because its obvious that you have a difficult time getting on your high horse.
I was just stating facts to why going electric is a necessity. It’s a must if we want to keep living in the planet. Fun fact, if we screw things up so much that we go extinct after we are long gone the planet will heal it self and go back to regular programming meaning the problem is actually just for us humans. The planet will go on his merry way ahahah.
In a year (if it arrives in time) the plaid model S. But I’m a big polluter since I fly a lot, try to eat less animal products to compensate
So let me get this straight- You currently own and drive a high gas guzzling super car, you dont own any electric cars, you have one on order that is supposedly going to go into production in about 2 years, you fly a lot and are lecturing the rest of us on the evils of pollution? Got it.
Buying a triple motor, massive battery, $150k super electric is saving the environment? You're adding no value here and just taking up the timeline with pure garbage.
Guys, please keep the politics out of this sub-forum. Sent from my SM-G930F using FerrariChat.com mobile app