As poorly executed as it is, it does have some interesting design features. If they cleaned it up a lot the overall shape and idea is interesting. The roof shape reminds of a Citroen concept sportscar from years ago.
I don't like it as a "car" because it's obnoxious and the definition of not practical. But to contradict myself: that's also why I love it.
It is entirely possible to make a compelling design from that theme, but finesse can be your friend..... Image Unavailable, Please Login
Citroen Karin from 1980. Same rood idea around the driver. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
it is contextual. in the world of SUV designs that i generally do not like.....this is the better one i have seen.
The difference between the Lancia Stratos Zero and the Tesla Cybertruck is a difference in proportions. There's the design lesson for today. Proportions matter. -F
Not so sure, profile looks a bit fishy in the rear to me...the rear looks ok, but from profile i just don't like it...but i like the interior a lot!
We’ll remember today as the day cars became appliances. Why spend time, money and resources on design if you don’t need to spend any for the internals and after a few years it’s cheaper to throw away than replace the batteries?
Also a difference in potential load capacities. Possibilities include: 1/8, 1/12, 1/18, 1/25, and 1/43 "cargo" capacities. Image Unavailable, Please Login
It's weird, but the more I see it the more it looks interesting. It looks much different on the road near other cars than just by itself on a stage IMO. I doubt it sells well, but I think it's an interesting attempt at breaking the mould and figuring out if you can in fact sell a simple, cheap, easy to manufacture vehicle. At the end of the day, a lot of the cost of cars is in aesthetics and not function. If you can get people to just buy utilitarian vehicles, that's actually probably a good thing.