Go Back   FerrariChat.com > Model Specific Discussions > Vintage (thru 365 GTC4) - Sponsored by Redline Restorations

Reply
 
Share/Bookmark LinkBack Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 04-15-2012, 01:23 PM
Formula Junior
Not Subscribed
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York City
Full Name: Dave Powers
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terra View Post
4675's value in relation to 250 GTOs such as 5095 and 3943, I believe, is far more attributable to the market reality that Series II coachwork is not quite as popular/sought-after vs Series I coachwork (i.e. rather than being due to 4675 having started out life as a Series I, but getting subsequently rebodied very early in-period at Ferraris's behest into a Series II, as also happened to 3413, 4091 and 4399).
I think there will always be a premium paid for Series I over Series II cars. Of course there are exceptions.
When you look at the Series II GTO's, you can generalize and divide race histories into 2 categories; privateer with mostly hillclimbs 'hillclimbers', and cars that ran in the front ranks in some of the major international races of the day. Not to say anything negative at all about hillclimbs, just that in terms of 'value' perception people will pay more for 'name' races etc.
When you take the Series II GTO's as a group, 4675 has been called into question for the modern state of its front end 'nose' etc.
I mentioned it along with 3445 because; it has sold recently, and because of the nose issues etc.

Best,
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-15-2012, 06:29 PM
Formula Junior
Rossa Subscribed
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by readplays View Post
4675 has been called into question for the modern state of its front end 'nose' etc.
I mentioned it along with 3445 because; it has sold recently, and because of the nose issues etc.

Best,
Dave
4675's nose details are currently in the process of being changed back to how they were in period.

3445's current nose details are correct from its very early days (i.e. pre-Ulf Norinder).

This was the point in time BEFORE it got its Blue and Yellow 'Swedish Colors' paint job.
Reply With Quote
Non-Sponsor Ads
  #43  
Old 04-15-2012, 07:42 PM
Formula Junior
Not Subscribed
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York City
Full Name: Dave Powers
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terra View Post
4675's nose details are currently in the process of being changed back to how they were in period.

3445's current nose details are correct from its very early days (i.e. pre-Ulf Norinder).

This was the point in time BEFORE it got its Blue and Yellow 'Swedish Colors' paint job.
I think we're going around and around in circles here.

My posts in this thread have always been driven by a single point:
I would prefer a car that has as much of its original sheet metal as possible.

Yes, that goes for the rest of the car/its parts as well.
For the sake of it, I will call that condition 'original'.
I would like as original a car as possible.

Yes, for a competition car race history is of paramount importance.
Yes, I understand cars break while racing.
Not discounting either of those things at all.

I'm not sure how you introduced the subject of 3445's nose.
My point has always been that 3445's WHOLE BODY is 15 years younger than the car. While others can debate over whether the details are 'correct' or not, I will take the position that the original bodies were hand made by a limited group of men at a certain Point in Time. Anything that does not include all those elements will be some degree of Less Original.
I may be wrong or I may be outside the norm, as it were, but that is the clearest I can state my position.


In case I'm not being clear, I don't care how correct the details of a later Copy appear for the purposes of comparing them to a replica.
They're both replicas.
The car in Post #1 of this thread is a replica.
Ferrari 250 GTO c/n 3445GT is a real Series I GTO with a REPLICA body. Replica in the sense that it was made from scratch in the middle 1970's. I'm not interested in how good a copy it is of a real Series I body because it is that: a Copy.

With regards to 4675, to reiterate, I chose this car to discuss because it had a clear Current Market Value via its recent Private Treaty sale on the open market AND it was Not a No Stories car, mechanically. While they may have been mild, there were some issues.
That to me effects the value just as buying a Series I with a body made completely from scratch in the 70's is going to effect the value compared to a similar Series I without these issues.

We may have veered just slightly off topic in our sub-discussion, Terra.
I would be more than happy to move on, agree to disagree, or carry on this conversation privately- if any of those would work for you.

Thank you for your points and Forza!

Best,
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-15-2012, 08:52 PM
Formula Junior
Rossa Subscribed
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by readplays View Post
With regards to 4675, to reiterate, I chose this car to discuss because it had a clear Current Market Value via its recent Private Treaty sale on the open market AND it was Not a No Stories car, mechanically.
Are you now saying that 4675 is NOT a 'No Stories' car mechanically?

If that's what you're saying, how so?
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-15-2012, 10:51 PM
Formula Junior
Rossa Subscribed
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by readplays View Post
I'm not sure how you introduced the subject of 3445's nose.
In Post #41, when you said the below, I mistakenly thought you were referring to something about 3445's nose:

'When you take the Series II GTO's as a group, 4675 has been called into question for the modern state of its front end 'nose' etc.
I mentioned it along with 3445 because; it has sold recently, and because of the nose issues etc.'
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-16-2012, 04:02 PM
Karting
Not Subscribed
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Full Name: Alex
Posts: 133
What's wrong with 4675 mechanically?

But yes, if we're really going that way, it has a "more" original body than 3445. It's just that rebodied 62's appear to be at the bottom of the GTO food chain (below the original 64's and original 62's). And neither the Breadvan nor the 330's nor 3809+3967 (engines?) should be allowed to be shown at GTO meetings.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-04-2012, 10:57 AM
Rookie
Not Subscribed
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Yeah, it's real.

Back to the original question, is it real or not? The answer is yes.

The owner is Michael Hammer, heir to the Armand Hammer fortune. He recently bought the GTO in Europe and had it flown over here to join his already impressive collection, which includes an original 427 Cobra and this amazing Bentley: http://www.flickr.com/photos/30204660@N06/3638149517/

I live in Montecito and every Sunday morning there is a Cars & Coffee get-together on Coast Village Road. Mike doesn't always show up, but when he does, he brings something good. Yesterday it was the GTO; last week it was a really cool Dodge Challenger R/T resto-mod.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-04-2012, 11:01 AM
Formula Junior
Rossa Subscribed
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pensive.D View Post
The owner is Michael Hammer, heir to the Armand Hammer fortune.
And father of rising movie star Arnie Hammer.
Reply With Quote
Non-Sponsor Ads
  #49  
Old 07-11-2012, 10:15 PM
Karting
Not Subscribed
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Santa Barbara, Ca.
Full Name: Martin
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pensive.D View Post
Back to the original question, is it real or not? The answer is yes.

The owner is Michael Hammer, heir to the Armand Hammer fortune. He recently bought the GTO in Europe and had it flown over here to join his already impressive collection, which includes an original 427 Cobra and this amazing Bentley: http://www.flickr.com/photos/30204660@N06/3638149517/

I live in Montecito and every Sunday morning there is a Cars & Coffee get-together on Coast Village Road. Mike doesn't always show up, but when he does, he brings something good. Yesterday it was the GTO; last week it was a really cool Dodge Challenger R/T resto-mod.
Is this the same car that was involved in the Cox accident?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.


FerrariChat.com has no association with Ferrari S.p.A.
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.