Float height for Webers - Part II | FerrariChat

Float height for Webers - Part II

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by Peter, Aug 26, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Peter

    Peter F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Dec 21, 2000
    6,440
    B.C., Canada
    #1 Peter, Aug 26, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Last month I had posted problems I experienced when I changed my float heights in my carbs. This was due to fuel spilling over and out of the main discharge nozzles (where the emulsion tube/main jets empty out into), whenever the car pointed up and stopped on a hill. This excess fuel - and lots of it - would flood the engine and kill it.

    My experiment was to drop the height of the floats and therefore lower the height of the fuel in the emulsion tube well, so as not to spill over when pointing up a hill. It worked, but I lowered them too much as it changed the relationship with the fuel and the emulsion tubes, causing the car to run way lean (range of 16 to as high as 18:1 AFR. Stock, U.S. spec jetting and float height of 52mm).

    Anthony "ants2au" from Australia had mentioned his carbs were set to Euro specs, with a max float height of 51mm (instead of the factory settings of 50mm) and he didn't have problems stopping on hills, so I figured I'd try that on my car and see what it would do. Dyno'ed it today and these were the results:

    Max HP: 182 @ 6700RPM (HP line on print-out graph shows HP still increasing strongly)
    Max torque: 148 lbs-ft @ 4200RPM (nearly flat, lowest reading was 134 lbs-ft @ 3700RPM)

    Important part:

    Air-fuel ratio range: from a very rich 9.7:1 @ 3700RPM to the leanest of 11.2:1 @ 6700RPM.

    The carb settings causing these readings:

    Float height: 51mm
    Main jets: 140
    Emulsion tubes: F24
    Air correctors: 205
    Idle jets: 57

    I agree that it is a little too rich, so I can bump the main jets back down to 135's and I can go with 200 air correctors to clear up a phase of leaning occuring at 5500RPM.

    The biggest factor is definitely the emulsion tubes. They are much smaller in diameter allowing more fuel reserve in the tube well and have more direct paths for fuel to flow through (unlike the U.S. spec F36's, which don't have a central bore above the main jet, restricting flow somewhat). Less holes as well, so less air mixing with the fuel. See photo below.

    The car drives great as is (although I noticed it has been thirsty in my recent test drives and dyno run). Looks like it won't die stopped on a hill, which is a big plus for me!
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    I love these discussions, God help me I love them so

    would be interested in the numbers on your 'lean' high end of 11.2:1 - A 205 a/c with a 140/F24 combo is not usually that lean. The range you should shoot for is in the 13's from 4000 all the way up with perhaps a slight richening to the high 12s above 7000 (but it will do fine in the 13s). Your low end richness and poor cruise mpg may also partially be those monster 57 idles reaching up into the high transition. Your 140s already reach pretty far down for main circuit entry so there is every reaon to expect your numbers and performance.

    Although I by no means guarantee the numbers, my crystal ball would say bring the idles down to 50 - 52, keep mains at 40 ( to keep earlier main circuit transition - a good thing) and lean up the upper end slowly and progressively first with 210 a/c.
     
  3. Peter

    Peter F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Dec 21, 2000
    6,440
    B.C., Canada
    I didn't think/believe that the 57's would have made that much of an increase over the stock 55's I had in there before. Looking at the chart, yes, it appears as the two phases meet (progression circuit and main at around the 3700 RPM mark), it contributes to this high AFR of 9.7:1. From 3700 onwards to 4300RPM it leans out a whole point (to 10.6:1) then stays absolutely flat at that to 5500RPM, where it suddenly and consistantly rises to a high of 11.2:1.

    I certainly don't want to go any leaner with the idles as when I bought the car, I had severe stumbling problems when driving away from a stop. There were 45's in there. I replaced them with the stock 55's and it cured that stumbling problem.
     
  4. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    The balance we, all true ferraristi w/carbs, seek is the idle size and main size and transition overlap. I once had a hole right at 3500 rpm at cruise and lemme tell ya you can feel it and it is annoying. My bet is at a 70 mph cruise you are burnin' gas away at AFR 10 - 11 (I've been there, done that on my portable LM-1 AFR) with those hose pipe idles (**those sizes are more typically used with larger venturis and more aggressive cams that generate a lower idle vacuum signal**). With 140 mains and F24s (my favorite ET, and I'm assuming 32mm venturis) your main circuit should reach down far enough to allow a bit smaller idle.
    You can go to a smaller main, but your cruise mpg are still going to be poop as you will still primarily be on the idle/transition circuit at cruise.
    I hope you have quite the hot plug at these AF's as well.

    It was my experience that with 34mm venturis, a change of 5 in the idle jet size translated into a full point or better at cruise - and Lord knows you have some room as you should target AFR 13 - 14 at cruise. And your numbers would be possibly a bit more exaggerated with the higher velocity 32mm venturis.

    Don't worry about being too lean on dumping the throttle - the accell jets will hold it down near 10 - 11 for several seconds until you are well into the main circuit to protect from an overly lean situation.

    As you are also finding as I did, an overly rich mixture is tolerated by the Ferrari, at least for a while, and covers a lot of other ills. It is still not too difficult to get it a bit tighter, and you will feel the difference as you will pick up some response and umph once you get closer to the 13's.

    best of luck - and have fun!
     
  5. Peter

    Peter F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Dec 21, 2000
    6,440
    B.C., Canada
    I'm running NGK 5's (have been for a while, even before this work). They have held up very well, consistent gap, no fouling.

    I'll be heading back to the dyno when time permits and see if I can get it better.
     
  6. bill308

    bill308 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    May 13, 2001
    1,224
    Windsor, CT
    Full Name:
    Bill Sebestyen
    Some thoughts on the effects of lowering the float level on DCNF's.

    All the owners manuals I've seen for 308's specify a float level of 48 mm, with the exception of the 40 DCNF /45-/48 series (early US spec GT-4's), which specify a float level of 50 mm, or 2 mm lower than other versions of this carb.

    So how does the difference in float level affect the carb and it's settings?

    With fuel at a lower level, it will have to be lifted higher for a given vacuum signal. This means all circuits should be leaner, but there will also be other effects.

    1. idle jets and idle circuit - the idle circuit will be a little leaner. Work around: richen idle mixture by backing out on the idle mixture screw.

    2. progression circuit - the over all effect will be leaner progression. Enrichment by the idle screw only affects what is in reality the first of several progression holes. Also, the progression circuit range will be limited as it approaches where the mains come in. In effect, it will cut out earlier. Work around: Fit a richer idle jet which affects all progression holes. This will not likely have much affect on the cut out point, only the volume up to the point of cut out.

    3. main circuit - The mains will be leaner throughtout their rpm range, as if fitted with a smaller jet size and the main circuit will come in later. Work around: Fit a larger main jet. The larger main jet will not likely have much affect on the point at which the mains come in, only the fuel volume.

    4. Accelerator pump - refilling of the pump chamber will be slowed slightly. Probably not an issue.

    5. Cold starting circuit - A leaner mixture will be delivered if the choke is used, making the choke circuit less sensitive and less prone to flooding if you use the choke.

    6. If the engine starves for fuel in tight right hand turns, it will now be worse.

    7. If the engine floods on hills, the situation will improve.

    Effects 2 and 3 suggest a method for dealing with the meshing of the transition and main overlap. If it is determined that this transition area is running richer than desired, because both the progression circuit and main circuit are feeding more fuel than desired, lowering of the float/fuel level could be an effective tool in fine tuning this portion of the operating range, both by decreasing the fuel volume and the points at which the circuits are disabled and enabled. Other affected areas could be compensated if necessary by increasing jet sizes or enrichening idle mixture adjustment.

    Higher fuel levels would have opposite effects.

    Bill
     

Share This Page