No Scuderia shields on a Red/Tan Ferrari strikes me as peculiar and I am intrigued as to why. I was thinking of not getting them because I didn't actually want people to know right away it was a Ferrari, that's why I also went with Grigio Silverstone instead of a Red exterior. I didn't want to draw attention to it. I also objected to having to pay for the shields. I think Ferrari should charge extra if you don't want them. However, I do think it perhaps starts to look a little toyish with them on there. However, when your Ferrari is red, it seems you definitely don't mind the attention but the Scuderia shields complete the picture in that color combo. Maybe you thought in Red and Tan you wouldn't need SF Shields for people to know that it was Ferrari right away. So why no shields? By the way, I got them in the end, thanks to my rep encouraging me. I am sure the first couple of weeks I won't want the attention then later I will probably wish I had gotten the car in Red so people will know right away.
Mine is the same Mugello/Cuoio color scheme as Balsimina's, but with shields. Bought it off the lot so didn't have the option of not having the shields....but at the time I had a Silverstone on order and the dealer gave me the same story about shields and resale value. Having said that, I hope it's purely a personal choice...not so much about what other's might think. From my perspective, I envy his brave choice to keep it clean.
Thanks again all for the kind remarks. On shields, to me the lines and curves of the panel flow better if the yellow and graphics aren't there to distract my (untrained) eye, esp. with the side vents underneath. Also, I approached spec'ing my car with a 60s GT theme in mind, and so not having the shields was appropriate for my non-competition GT. By way of background, my 1962 XKE is British Racing Green/Biscuit (tan), and my first Porsche was Silver/Metropole Blue (almost Black). A Silver/Carrera Red combination would have been my first choice for the 911 had a used one been available when I was looking. Since my California is my first Italian car, I wanted the national color, and since I wanted a 60s GT theme I decided a color closer to Rosso Rubino would be better for me than Corsa or Scuderia. Rubino would have been a custom color ($$$), but I like Mugello better anyway. Obviously very subjective opinions & desires, and if you'll bear with me I'll also share some of my other thoughts that went into buying the car that caused me to end up without shields. I decided to order the car rather than buy a used one because there was hardly any price differential at the time I was looking, and knowing how some people fantasize about racing Ferraris and would probably be hard on the car if they intended to flip it after a few thousand miles, I wanted to know the provenance of such an expensive item. Plus, the car is a reward to myself for some business success, so the notion of the factory building something bespoke to me gave me even further satisfaction. It also helped that I lucked into my dealer having available an allocation that was about to be frozen for production just a couple weeks after ordering, so the gratification wasn't deferred too long. I am probably the ideal case study for Ferrari's target marketing demographic for the California. Once I made the decision to buy new, I decided I would order the car for my personal tastes rather than focusing on resale value since after all I was paying a premium, however small it was, and would have to wait several months. I did take comfort, though, that my sales guy told me that he would have no trouble reselling my car. We discussed shields and he was supportive of going without them, and has remarked the couple times I have seen him since taking delivery that he has suggested to other clients they consider going without them for certain configurations. Jason, good luck with achieving your goal. I think you are wise to make sure your financial house is in order first. Cavalier, with the Mugello people do seem to notice the car plenty enough. I actually would prefer to be more discreet, but the desire for Italian red overrules on this one. Even without the shields or resale red though, there are plenty of design cues and branding on the car that reminds one that it is a Ferrari. The egg crate grill, hood scoop, engine and rear rocker side air vents/scoops, silver cavallinos fore and aft, badge on hood and script on trunk and the yellow/black cavallino wheel caps. Not to mention all the script & cavallinos inside the car. I think one of the guys on the Vintage board made a derogatory comment about all the branding on the car to appeal to people new to the marque, and while I think Ferrari SPA can't be stuck solely in the ways of the past if it is to continue to grow as a business, I think he makes a fair point. With that said, however, I think Grigio Silverstone with the shields will be stunning. not4one, thanks for the supportive remark. I had a chuckle when I read it - the remark about being "brave" almost made me feel like I didn't know I was marching into battle, and maybe I didn't realize the risk I was taking!
Thanks for the answer. Always interested to see what others are thinking about and deciding on when ordering their vehicles. I am really trying to behave my car obsession. I have been fortunate to have a successful practice now in my 4th year, and have had some really fantastic vehicles (2007 BMW 530i, 2008 M5, 2010 X5M, and now a 2011 Cayenne Turbo). So, I am going to satiate my desires with German vehicles for a few years. Gonna get a 991 C4S or Turbo in 2-3 years as my first true fun car. Drive it for 6-7 years and then upgrade to the Ferrari. My biggest issue, other than financially committing to a vehicle like a California (a friend of mine has a 2011 California he got in September, upgrading from a 360), is driving it where I live. I live in a rural part of Eastern KY, and, despite having a very good amount of high income earners with several Ferrari's and Lambos, people are VERY judgmental. So, driving it during warm, beautiful weather is going to be interesting... Again, congrats man. Love the car. J
^^ Thanks again. Looks like you've enjoyed some sweet rides the last few years and you're still early in your career. Good for you. At 32, my daily driver was a 1972 BMW 2002 of which I was the 3d owner in its 25 years and had put on the majority of the miles. Best wishes.
I've now got close to 700 miles on the car, so the 1000 km break-in period is done. After ensuring the car was properly warmed up, while in sport & manual mode, on a uphill on-ramp to my local highway, from a complete stop I buried the throttle and let the engine wail almost all the way to redline. My goodness what a sound! And by the time I reached the highway I was already way past merging speed and quickly backed off! I can only imagine what the mid-engine cars are like!! Which triggered a question in my mind. Are you guys doing a break-in oil change after 2.5K or 5K miles, or do you just follow the factory maintenance interval? Thanks, Balsamina